Injuries in sports are an inevitability – if athletes are playing hard, chances are someone will eventually get hurt. But when are sports and recreation injuries a simple case of unavoidable bad luck, and when is it a direct result of a person or business’s negligence or actions?
If someone pursues a sports and recreation claim against you, your organization or your business for presumptively causing their injury, the experienced lawyers at the Law Office of Cameron Hawkins can help build a compelling defense on your behalf.
Reckless or negligent actions can potentially result in a legal claim. For instance, a coach who fails to implement proper safety protocols or provide the necessary safety gear could be liable for injuries attributable to those failures.
In cases involving minors, the lack of proper supervision during sports or recreational activities may lead to injuries. Coaches, instructors or facilities responsible for supervision could be held accountable.
A product manufacturer that produces faulty sporting equipment that directly causes an injury may be vulnerable to a lawsuit.
If an injury occurs due to the sports facility being in poor condition – such as having uneven or cracked surfaces or insufficient lighting – the property owner or manager could be held accountable.
Participants who weren’t warned of risks by a sporting event’s organizers and are subsequently injured may attempt to file claims for failure to warn.
Unfortunately, liability waivers are not always ironclad and can be challenged in court, especially if the language involved and the specific circumstances surrounding the injury are called into question.
It depends on your policy. Some homeowner's insurance policies may provide coverage for injuries that occur on your property during non-commercial sports activities, while others don’t.
If a coach’s actions or egregious lack of action directly resulted in a player’s injury, they may be held responsible in a sports and recreation claim.
Yes, other players can potentially be held liable in a sports and recreation injury legal claim if it can be proven a player recklessly or maliciously did something they knew or should have known would result in the serious injury of another player. However, verifying that the injury was caused intentionally can be challenging, so this type of case may be difficult to prove.
The Assumption of Risk Doctrine serves as a vital defense in personal injury cases arising from sports and recreational activities. It bars individuals who willingly volunteered for the activity from seeking compensation for injuries caused by known and foreseeable risks. Their assumption of risk can be established through either express consent (such as signing a liability waiver) or implied consent (participation without objection), possibly eliminating an organizer’s liability.
However, the Assumption of Risk Doctrine sometimes isn’t enough to protect you from a sports and recreation injury claim, which is why having skilled and aggressive legal representation on your side is essential.
Sports and recreation injury claims often present unique and stressful challenges. At the Law Office of Cameron Hawkins, our attorneys have experience defending organizations in sports and recreation injury cases. We’ll gather extensive evidence and provide a relentless defense to establish you acted appropriately, are shielded by existing doctrine and aren’t accountable for what happened. Call 678.921.4225 or book a free case consultation online today.
Law Office of Cameron Hawkins | All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The content on this website is for informational purposes only. This site and the information contained within is not legal advice, nor is it intended to be. Contacting the Law Office of Cameron Hawkins does not create an attorney-client relationship. Internet users should not act upon information contained on this site without first seeking advice from an attorney. Please refrain from sending any confidential information to The Law Office of Cameron Hawkins until an attorney-client relationship is established.
Disclaimer pursuant to Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1(a)(6): The statement "no attorneys' fees unless we are able to secure a verdict or settlement on your behalf" refers only to those fees charged by the attorney. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal actions usually must be paid by the client. Contingent fees are not permitted in all types of cases.